Guide for Peer Reviewers of Scientific Article [Article in Croatian]

Matko Marušić, Dario Sambunjak, Ana Marušić

Abstract


Despite its shoertcomings, review is still the best tool of scientific publishing. It brings benefits not only to the journal and its authors, but to the peer reveiwers: they are privileged to have an insight into the latest research and still unpublished results in their scientific field. Reveiwers also build up their ability to critically assess scientific papers, which may be useful in their own professional work and development. We wrote these guidlinnes to help Croatian-speaking physicians to satisfactorily respond in case they receive a scientific journal editor's request for a manuscript review. The guidelines were created primarily for new reveiwers, but they may be useful as a refresher text for experienced reviewers.


Full Text:

PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The full text of articles published in this journal can be used free of charge for personal and educational purposes while respecting authors and publishers' copyrights. For commercial purposes no part of this journal may be reproduced without the written permission of the publisher.